Anti-Capitalism pisses me off...

Since Christmas (that's the big holiday- for you fascist liberals) we've been pointing fingers and playing the blame game about this attempted terrorist act. Thank God it was only attempted. But, however you deal the cards, this is our government's fault. I don't care if it was the CIA, FBI, DHS, or Napolitano or Obama, the point is, it's our fault for allowing the government to control too much. I keep hearing that if a or b or c would have been in place by the NTSB or whatever stupid acronym is in charge of flight issues, this wouldn't have happened. I think rather, if the idiotic acronyms didn't exist, it wouldn't have happened. If free market were unimpeded in the airline industry, each airline would be responsible for the safety of its customers. Then, there would be someone to blame. Also, if they were in charge, there would be no questions about it, there would be full body scans of all passengers, maybe even dogs sniffing each and every passenger before they board the plane. Why? Because it is their business at stake, their name at stake, and IF something "untoward" happened, they'd lose business, and probably their entire business. They'd also tell people that wanted to buy tickets for their planes how it was, and if they didn't like it, fly with econo-air and take your own chances. The government, while in charge of airline safety, takes no responsibility for "accidents" acts of terrorism or acts of God, and can't be sued penniless for failure to provide what is expected. An airline can and would be. Free market is the answer to the war formerly known as the "war on terror". It is what Islamic jihadists hate the most about our culture, and should be the winning weapon for our side.

-J

Trial this on for size...

Maybe everyone is jumping a tad too fast to challenge the "NYC trials" of the terrorists from 9-11. When we injure ourselves, we have pain. After that injury, when we do something to aggravate that injury, we remember that we have that pain. Every time we forget, we do something asinine and end up re-injuring ourselves. So, that pain is important. It helps us to keep from doing the same thing over and over and over. I think we as Americans have forgotten the pain and sadness associated with that fateful day. Bringing the terrorists back to the scene of the "crime", and allowing them to spew their anti-American rhetoric, their Wahhabi insanity, and show their lack of remorse, may just remind our great country that we've been hurt, that we still have pain, and can still feel it. It may indeed serve to remind us that we are all Americans, and maybe once again we can bond together in the face of Islamic Extremism like in the post 9-11 USA. Perhaps, this one act of lunacy by our "esteemed" president will work out in our favor.

Side note: I do not agree that these trials should be considered "criminal". They were and continue to be ACTS OF WAR.

I need a fallout shelter...

What happens when Nadal jacknut Hasan whatever his name is decides to tell the truth about his "rampage". Wait, that won't happen, we can't force him to do anything against his will. But let's imagine for a minute that he does tell us. Let's suppose he tells us that we're infidels, that we support the jews, that his god told him to kill us. Kill the infidels. When those words spew forth, and other rancid filth from the mouth that spake "Allahu Akbar", will it then be a terrorist act? I guess it probably won't. It would be politically incorrect to call a member of our military a terrorist. But mostly I think we can't call an "American" muslim a terrorist. We can't do anything to unpopularize our country in the global world. Let me reminisce of my history lessons. When we were involved in our first war as the USofA, we had no friends. We had France. *Chuckles* France only helped us because they hated England more than bad wine and rotten cheese. We didn't care what Prussia thought, what China thought, what the penguins in the antarctic thought, we were doing what was best for us. Years later we become the greatest country on Earth. We still are, temporarily. The longer we cater to the minority\minorities that want us to bend twist and tiptoe around everything we stand for, the faster we become just another country on this planet. The faster we become poor, miserable, and UNpopular. Remember, there was a time when most of the world loved the good ole USA. We still send more aid to more places than any other country on this planet, whether it has to do with tax credits or not has no bearing, and yet more and more of these "aid accepting" cultures like us less and less. I say screw em. Let em starve. They don't want our help, we'll keep it for ourselves. So now, after years of political correctness, are we more popular? We're about as popular as a hemorrhoid for a sprinter. I don't care if people that I've never met like me. Do you?

On a side note, I am aware of a situation in Philadelphia regarding animal rights activists. It seems that it doesn't matter how little damage they cause up to a point, but as soon as a slogan is used it becomes jurisdiction for the FBI, and an act of "domestic terrorism". Is Allah Akbar a slogan for jihadist Islamist terrorists? You be the judge.

Quote:

"You can call him Barack Obama, I'll call him 'the reason history will be kind to 'W''" JMF

I must be crazy.

What motive? Why are we still looking for a motive. He was wearing a prayer robe and towel. He Shouted Allah Akbar! For goodness sake. If someone walked into a crowded room wearing a white sheet and a pointy hat and shot people up, and one, just one black man was killed, would we still be looking for a motive? This is insanity. In this situation do we really need to look for a motive? Will everyone in this country start to hate Muslims because of this man? I don't know, I doubt it. When the lunatic shot all those people at VT he was Asian. Do we hate all Asians? Let's call a spade a spade.

Addendum follows:

11-7-09

New thoughts. Whether or not this "man" is a radical muslim terrorist, I believe we should do our best to keep him alive and in a vegetative state, thereby eliminating the chances of martyrdom and the possibility of 72 virgins. Maybe if instead of killing our "enemy combatants" from now on we continue with this. How many radical Islamists would risk vegetation for their "cause"? Is this a new avenue for cryogenics?

No Blog...

I was going to discuss a write in cross country campaign, another time. May the Peace that passes all human understanding be with you Fort Hood.

Toddlers for Congress

Is anything productive happening in Congress? Should anything productive happen there? Would toddlers appreciate a socialist state? Can toddlers comprehend socialism?

It seems that Congress (Dems and GOP included) are spending their time arguing about who's pet project receives the most funding rather than listening to the American people. Is that the way it is intended? Do any of our representatives have our best interests at heart? When a majority of the American people want no part of a "single payer" health care policy, why is Congress still crafting models of it? Can Nancy Pelosi hear, or did a botched botox destroy her aural integrity? Does Harry Reid listen, or do the voices in his head drown out millions of taxpaying citizens? I'm convinced that Mr. Obama doesn't care what the people are saying. If he truly has a degree in law with special emphasis on Constitutional Law, then he should know that the will of the people is the law of the land. But, maybe, the degree with emphasis was for a different notion. Perhaps the Constitutional knowledge would also be necessary to work around, rather than within the law, legally. (I only had to write that sentence once, you may have to read a few times) Sun Tsu, a Chinese General, said (a partial quote) "know thy enemy". If your enemy is the Constitution, a law degree with a Constitutional law emphasis, would be invaluable. If your enemy is Mr. Obama, I'm not sure what to study, he changes his mind too often.

Now to the toddlers:

Let's elect toddlers for Congress. They'll work cheap (animal crackers, diapers, juice, milk, etc.) and it will be relatively cheap day care for parents. And, best of all, when the food is handed out in equal parts, they'll fight for more and behave just like the Congresspeople we're used to, showing us just how unrealistic socialism is.

J

The UN is a joke

"On Thursday, the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend U.N. authorization for the NATO force in Afghanistan for a year, underlining the importance of protecting civilians at a time when the U.S. and international commitment to the war is under review."

May I quote part of this quote from a AP article I found on Druge? Good, "at a time". Great, this is a time. "when the US and international commitment"... is under review". By who? The freaking UN? Who are they? I don't get it, this "war" has been going on for over 8 years now, and they're still reviewing it? We've had two polar opposite presidents that have both supported it, and wait, did i mention POLAR opposite, and they're still reviewing it? Come on, get real, get a life, find something important to decide on, like what china pattern you want at your next banquet for your next review of your next impending female review. That's important, take your time on Afghanistan, we understand. Of course they voted unanimously, so I suppose it's ok, but would they vote similarly on the female review? The UN is a joke. Can we secede?

PS- I can think of one fantastic reason for Obamacare. How old is Jimmy Carter now? =)